Five questions from the DocTayo newsletter for 6 October 2026. The correct answer is marked, and every one carries the statute or rule it rests on — so you can check any of them rather than taking my word for it.
Question 1A Georgia dentist issues a hydrocodone/acetaminophen prescription for a 7-day supply, 40 tablets, to a new adult patient after an extraction performed in the dental office. Which statement is correct?
- It is unlawful — Georgia caps an initial opioid prescription at 5 days
- It is unlawful — Georgia caps an initial opioid prescription at 26 pills
- It is lawful, and the prescriber was required to check the PDMP before issuing it
- It is lawful, and the pharmacist must check the PDMP before dispensing it
Georgia sets no general day-supply limit on an initial opioid prescription — nothing in Title 16 Chapter 13 caps one. The figures people remember as limits are something else: the prescriber must query the PDMP the first time they issue such a prescription unless it is for no more than a three-day supply and no more than 26 pills. Seven days and 40 tablets fails that exemption, so the check was mandatory. The pharmacist's position is the opposite — the statute says in terms that nothing in that part requires a dispenser to obtain patient information from the PDMP.
O.C.G.A. § 16-13-63(a)(2)(A)(i); § 16-13-63(a)(1)
Three details in the stem are doing work. A ten-day, 40-pill prescription after outpatient surgery at a hospital or ambulatory surgical center falls inside a different exemption, § 16-13-63(a)(2)(A)(iii) — so where the procedure happened matters. And an APRN or PA, rather than a dentist, may order hydrocodone or oxycodone only in emergency situations, and then only as an initial prescription not exceeding a five-day supply, under O.C.G.A. § 43-34-25(d.1) and § 43-34-103(e.1)(1)(B). That is a limit on who may prescribe what, not a general cap on initial opioid prescriptions — but it is the real rule behind option (a).
Question 2You are sitting the Georgia MPJE. The Board's own FAQ pages state the pharmacist-to-technician ratio is 1:3. What is the correct answer, stated completely?
- 1:3 — the Board writes the exam, so the Board's published position governs
- 1:4, counting every technician in the pharmacy, with no exceptions
- 1:4, not counting remote technicians, and the Board may approve an increase for a hospital or closed-door pharmacy
- 1:3 for community pharmacies and 1:4 for hospitals
The ratio has been one pharmacist to four technicians since HB 316 in 2021, and HB 382 rewrote § 26-4-82 effective 1 July 2026 without disturbing it. Two qualifications make the bare number incomplete: remote technicians are not counted toward the supervisory ratio, and the Board may approve an application to increase the ratio in a pharmacy located in a licensed hospital or in a closed-door pharmacy. The Board rule adds that two of the four must be certified. At the time of writing the Board's own FAQ pages still say 1:3 — contradicting not only the statute but the Board's own regulation, which also says four. Note the rule is itself behind the statute on one point: it allows a ratio increase only for a pharmacy in a licensed hospital, with no mention of the closed-door pharmacy the statute now covers.
O.C.G.A. § 26-4-82(d)(2), as amended by HB 382 eff. 1 July 2026; Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. r. 480-15-.03(e)
A board's FAQ page feels authoritative and is not law. Here it disagrees with the board's own rule.
Question 3Georgia has three provisions that let you supply medication without fresh authorization from the prescriber: a 72-hour emergency refill, a 30-day supply during a declared state of emergency, and a 90-day maintenance supply. Which one excludes Schedule II but still permits Schedules III, IV and V?
- The 72-hour emergency refill
- The 30-day supply during a declared state of emergency
- The 90-day maintenance supply
- None of them — all three exclude every controlled substance
The three exclude different things, and merging them is the classic error. The 72-hour emergency refill is available only where the prescription is not for a controlled substance — every schedule is out. The declared-emergency 30-day supply excludes Schedule II only, so III through V remain available. The 90-day maintenance supply excludes Schedules II, III, IV and V by name. Three provisions, three different exclusions, and three different notification duties: seven working days, 48 hours, and none respectively.
O.C.G.A. § 26-4-80(j)(1); § 26-4-80(f)(1)(A); § 26-4-80(q)(2)
Note that the 90-day maintenance supply is not an emergency provision at all — it needs no emergency at all. It does need more than judgment, though: consultation with the patient, a total within the dosage units the prescriber authorized including refills, and it is unavailable where the prescriber forbade it or where this is the first fill of a new maintenance drug or dose. Note too that the 30-day provision is triggered by a declared state of emergency or a National Weather Service hurricane warning.
Question 4A patient presents a written Schedule II prescription for 60 tablets. You have the full quantity on hand, but the patient asks you to fill only 20 now. Under federal law, when must the remaining portion be filled?
- Within 72 hours of the partial filling
- Within 30 days of the date the prescription was written
- Within 30 days of the partial filling
- Within 60 days of the date the prescription was issued
Where a Schedule II prescription is partially filled at the request of the patient or the prescriber, the remaining portions must be filled not later than 30 days after the date on which the prescription is written — not 30 days from the partial fill. The distinction matters: a prescription presented a week after it was written leaves 23 days, not 30. Two other provisions use different clocks, which is where the distractors come from. If the pharmacist cannot supply the full quantity, the remainder may be filled only within 72 hours of the first partial filling, and no further quantity may be supplied after that without a new prescription. For a patient in a long-term care facility or with a medically documented terminal illness, the prescription may be partially filled for up to 60 days from the issue date.
21 U.S.C. § 829(f)(2)(A)(ii); 21 C.F.R. § 1306.13(b)(2), (a), (c); Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. r. 480-22-.06(2)(b)
The clock runs from the writing date, not the fill date — and which clock applies depends on who asked for the partial fill. An emergency oral Schedule II prescription runs 72 hours instead.
Question 5Which best states a pharmacist's corresponding responsibility for a controlled substance prescription?
- The pharmacist must fill any facially valid prescription from a registered prescriber
- The pharmacist shares responsibility for the prescription's legitimacy with the prescriber and may not fill one issued outside the usual course of professional practice
- The responsibility rests entirely with the prescriber, who holds the DEA registration for the issuance
- The responsibility applies only to Schedule II prescriptions
A controlled substance prescription is only effective when issued for a legitimate medical purpose by a practitioner acting in the usual course of professional practice. The federal regulation puts responsibility for proper prescribing and dispensing on the prescriber, “but a corresponding responsibility rests with the pharmacist who fills the prescription.” Georgia imposes the same duty from two directions, and they do not quite line up: the Board rule gives a pharmacist “the same corresponding liability for prescriptions as an issuing practitioner” as set out in 21 C.F.R. as it existed on 1 January 2013, while the statute fixes the reference to 21 C.F.R. Part 1304 on the same date.
21 C.F.R. § 1306.04(a); Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. r. 480-5-.03(14); O.C.G.A. § 26-4-80(b)
Worth knowing that the statute's cross-reference is imprecise: Part 1304 is Records and Reports of Registrants and contains no corresponding-responsibility language — that rule lives at 21 C.F.R. § 1306.04. Answer the doctrine, not the cross-reference.
Want these every Tuesday?
Five questions a week, plus what actually changed in pharmacy law and one thing worth knowing before you sit. Free.
Unsubscribe in one click.
Want a lot more than five?
The question banks run to hundreds of items with full rationales, written the same way: New York MPJE, Texas MPJE and NAPLEX.
The federal rules people lose marks on →
All questions of the week →